Access to housing has become one of the main social and economic concerns in recent years. The sustained rise in prices and the shortage of supply have led public authorities to consider new solutions. In this context, the Government is studying measures to control speculative housing purchases through new taxation and by requiring that acquired properties are genuinely used as primary residences. This initiative aims to rebalance the real estate market and restore housing to its social function, sparking intense debate among buyers, investors, and industry professionals.
The rise of speculative housing purchases in recent years
What is meant by speculative housing purchases
Speculative housing purchases refer to the acquisition of properties primarily for economic gain, whether for short- or medium-term resale, to achieve high returns through rental income, or simply as a financial asset. While real estate investment is part of the normal functioning of the market, its growth in certain areas has significantly reduced the supply available to those seeking a home to live in, especially in high-demand urban areas.
How it affects purchase and rental prices
The increase in speculative transactions has had a direct impact on rising prices for both home ownership and rentals. Competition between investors and individual buyers drives up sale prices, while the reduction in available residential housing further tightens the rental market. As a result, many families and young people are pushed to peripheral areas or forced to take on an ever-greater financial burden to access housing.
The new taxation the Government is considering to curb speculation
Main objectives of the measure
The Government’s proposal aims to discourage speculative purchases without eliminating real estate investment altogether. The idea is to introduce differentiated taxation that prioritizes residential use and favors access for those who genuinely need a home. The goal is to increase the supply of housing available for living, moderate price increases, and reduce pressure in the most strained markets.
What fiscal changes could be applied
Although the measure is still under review, the new taxation could result in higher taxes for buyers who do not allocate properties to primary residence use. The possibility of surcharges on the purchase of second or third homes is also being considered, alongside tax incentives for those who can prove that the property will be used as their main residence. The objective is to influence market behavior through taxation rather than imposing direct prohibitions.
The key condition: the purchased home must be used for living
How residential use could be guaranteed
One of the most complex aspects of the proposal is ensuring that purchased housing is genuinely used as a residence. To this end, the Government is studying different control mechanisms that allow residential use to be verified without creating excessive administrative burdens. Options under consideration include registering residence at the property, limiting how long a property can remain vacant, or monitoring its conversion into tourist rentals. The challenge will be finding a balance between effectiveness and regulatory simplicity.
What this condition means for individual buyers
For buyers seeking their first home or a permanent residence, this measure could provide significant relief. Reduced speculative pressure could translate into greater housing availability and more balanced competition. In addition, a less strained market could promote greater price stability in the medium term, making housing access easier for those currently excluded.
Impact of the measure on investors and the real estate market
How investment strategies may change
The introduction of stricter taxation on speculative purchases would force many investors to rethink their strategies. Instead of quick resale-oriented transactions, interest may shift toward long-term projects or stable residential rentals. This change could reduce immediate pressure on the purchase market and encourage an investment model more aligned with housing needs.
Possible effects on supply and prices
If the measure is effectively implemented, the real estate market could experience a slowdown in price growth, particularly in the most pressured areas. In the medium term, greater availability of housing for permanent use could contribute to increased market stability. However, its success will largely depend on these measures being complemented by policies that expand the supply of new and affordable housing.
An open debate with advantages and risks
Arguments in favor of controlling speculation
Supporters of the measure believe that controlling speculative purchases is essential to guaranteeing the right to housing. Prioritizing residential use would help curb price escalation, reduce pressure on the rental market, and protect buyers seeking a home. From this perspective, housing should fulfill a social function that goes beyond its value as a financial asset.
Criticism and concerns from the sector
On the other hand, critics warn of potential negative effects, such as reduced real estate investment or increased legal uncertainty. They also point to the difficulty of applying and enforcing such measures effectively. For many industry professionals, the challenge lies in regulating without slowing economic activity or discouraging the creation of new housing.
The fact that the Government is considering controlling speculative housing purchases through new taxation and residential-use requirements reflects the seriousness of the housing access problem. If applied with balance and consistency, this measure could mark a turning point in the real estate market, helping to restore some of the lost accessibility. However, its effectiveness will depend on a comprehensive approach combining regulation, taxation, and increased supply.
If you want to stay up to date with the real estate market, subscribe to our newsletter to receive more news and advice.
